A sonnet by the Scots poet Mark Alexander Boyd, reprinted by Pound who called it the most beautiful sonnet in the language. Text is from The Oxford Book of English Verse (1919 – is it still in?). There is a fan site for Boyd with pictures of the blind boy and the wife, beautifully designed, which prints the poem with notes on provenance and references – and a glossary.

114. Sonet

FRA bank to bank, fra wood to wood I rin,
Ourhailit with my feeble fantasie;
Like til a leaf that fallis from a tree,
Or til a reed ourblawin with the win.
Twa gods guides me: the ane of tham is blin, 5
Yea and a bairn brocht up in vanitie;
The next a wife ingenrit of the sea,
And lichter nor a dauphin with her fin.
Unhappy is the man for evermair
That tills the sand and sawis in the air; 10
But twice unhappier is he, I lairn,
That feidis in his hairt a mad desire,
And follows on a woman throw the fire,
Led by a blind and teachit by a bairn.



 
Ezra Pound in 1914

Ezra Pound in 1914

The teacher or lecturer is a danger. He very seldom recognises his nature or his position. The lecturer is a man who must talk for an hour.

A pleasure of aging: to reconsider books that have helped to form your attitudes. Another: not having to talk for an hour.

Ezra Pound’s The ABC of Reading (1934 – but I read it in the early 1960s) could be described as an eccentric textbook, but it’s more of a manifesto. It comprises a little generalisation about literature, a lot of examples of poetry – almost an anthology – some commentary and a reading list.

Pound thought it necessary to have a standard, to read the best that has been done in its kind. What complicates this goal for him is that no one language holds a monopoly of literary virtue. For Pound, a real understanding of poetry requires a swag of languages (Chinese, Greek, Latin, Anglo-Saxon, French, Italian, Provencal and more). Cross-cultural comparison holds no terrors. To see that Greek drama is not all that good, he advises you to read Homer. Don’t bother with German – he has read it all for you, and found nothing standard-setting. The monoglot gets a look-in. Pound concedes that you can get most of it by reading ‘authorised’ translations such as Pound’s own of Seafarer, Golding’s Ovid or Gavin Douglas’s Virgil. But the strongest impression left by the book – on one seventeen year old reader, at least – is that anyone without a working knowledge of half-a-dozen languages is a dabbler.

As Pound might say: balls. But at seventeen, the book conjured up a marvellous, if deeply confusing landscape – all those exotic peaks waiting to be conquered – and the promise of initiation into the mysteries of the craft, all presented far more enticingly than the plodding textbooks with their pother about iambic pentameter. I suppose I was open to the idea of a cosmopolitan canon because of my immersion in music ? Continue reading »

 

At the New Yorker, Joan Acocella has an intelligent and typically graceful essay on the Dracula thing – origins, romantic form of, subsequent treatments of, annotated versions of – very thorough treatment. She brings the story up to the current teenage hit, Twilight, and its sequels. (Number one son says Twilight is sort of OK but the sequel is rubbish.)

She asks, Why is there a cult about this particular figure? Good question, I reckon, speaking as one untouched and untouchable by stories, films, plays or essays about Dracula.

. . . cults often gather around powerful works of the second rank. Fans feel that they have to root for them. What, then, is the source of ?Dracula? ?s power? A simple device, used in many notable works of art: the deployment of great and volatile forces within a very tight structure.

That assumes that the supernatural, for the reader, counts as a ‘great and volatile force’, even if we gloss the supernatural in the various ways it has been: as strange forms of desire, Continue reading »

 

Statement by Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. following Congress?s passage of today?s rescue package:

As we all know, lax writing practices earlier this decade led to irresponsible writing and irresponsible reading. This simply put too many families into books they could not finish. We are seeing the impact on readers and neighborhoods, with five million Americans now behind on their reading. Some are just walking away from novels they should never have been reading in the first place. What began as a subprime reading problem has spread to other, less-risky readers and contributed to excess inventories.

Julian Gough in the New York Times. He doesn’t spare the ratings agencies, either.

Hat tip to the good Dr Phillips.

 

O to break loose. All life’s grandeur
is something with a girl in summer.

_ Robert Lowell, ‘Waking Early Sunday Morning’

The lines came back to me tonight after forty years. It was 1968 when I first read Lowell’s Near the Ocean. I was 25, the summers were hot, young women were still ‘girls’, the alliance of sex and grandeur not yet comic. I knew what those lines were about.

When I went to check the quotation the web offered up this:

Lowell’s decline begins shortly after his next volume, Near the Ocean, whose opening poem also contains the dated and sexist couplet ‘All life’s grandeur/ is something with a girl in summer’.

Tom Paulin, reviewing Lowell’s Collected Poems in the Guardian
and making certain sure, in the manner of the old Soviet Writers Union, to show that he knows who and what to denounce.

Here’s the complete stanza.

O to break loose. All life’s grandeur
is something with a girl in summer …
elated as the President
girdled by his establishment
this Sunday morning, free to chaff
his own thoughts with his bear-cuffed staff,
swimming nude, unbuttoned, sick
of his ghost-written rhetoric!

And the complete poem, the strange, strained, fitfully brilliant poem is here.

 

In universities, it’s no longer possible to discuss a book of the type formerly known as a work of literature as if all the people in the room might have an equal and similar interest in it. Nowadays books are divided like carcases into choice cuts and distributed to hungry scholars. (The genitals are particularly prized and fought over.) The rule for who gets what, however, is the inverse of what happens in the wilderness: the weakest and most disadvantaged species get the lion’s share.
And now according to the Chronicle of Higher Education, we have age studies. Apparently people who study it hate being asked how old they are.

Theme Tweaker by Unreal