At the New Yorker, Joan Acocella has an intelligent and typically graceful essay on the Dracula thing – origins, romantic form of, subsequent treatments of, annotated versions of – very thorough treatment. She brings the story up to the current teenage hit, Twilight, and its sequels. (Number one son says Twilight is sort of OK but the sequel is rubbish.)

She asks, Why is there a cult about this particular figure? Good question, I reckon, speaking as one untouched and untouchable by stories, films, plays or essays about Dracula.

. . . cults often gather around powerful works of the second rank. Fans feel that they have to root for them. What, then, is the source of ?Dracula? ?s power? A simple device, used in many notable works of art: the deployment of great and volatile forces within a very tight structure.

That assumes that the supernatural, for the reader, counts as a ‘great and volatile force’, even if we gloss the supernatural in the various ways it has been: as strange forms of desire, Continue reading »

 

There’s a long article on him in the New Yorker online, the most detailed account I’ve seen of his writer’s journey. The account of his last days makes painful reading.

 

O to break loose. All life’s grandeur
is something with a girl in summer.

_ Robert Lowell, ‘Waking Early Sunday Morning’

The lines came back to me tonight after forty years. It was 1968 when I first read Lowell’s Near the Ocean. I was 25, the summers were hot, young women were still ‘girls’, the alliance of sex and grandeur not yet comic. I knew what those lines were about.

When I went to check the quotation the web offered up this:

Lowell’s decline begins shortly after his next volume, Near the Ocean, whose opening poem also contains the dated and sexist couplet ‘All life’s grandeur/ is something with a girl in summer’.

Tom Paulin, reviewing Lowell’s Collected Poems in the Guardian
and making certain sure, in the manner of the old Soviet Writers Union, to show that he knows who and what to denounce.

Here’s the complete stanza.

O to break loose. All life’s grandeur
is something with a girl in summer …
elated as the President
girdled by his establishment
this Sunday morning, free to chaff
his own thoughts with his bear-cuffed staff,
swimming nude, unbuttoned, sick
of his ghost-written rhetoric!

And the complete poem, the strange, strained, fitfully brilliant poem is here.

 

There no rules when it came to writing, he said. Take a close look at the lives of poets and novelists, and what you wound up with was unalloyed chaos, an infinite jumble of exceptions. That was because writing was a disease, Tom continued, what you might call an infection or influenza of the spirit, and therefore it could strike anyone at any time. Scan the roster of the giants and semi-giants, and you would discover writers who embraced every sexual proclivity, every political bent, and every human attribute – from the loftiest idealism to the most insidious corruption. They were criminals and lawyers, spies and doctors, soldiers and spinsters, travelers and shut-ins.

_ Paul Auster, The Brooklyn Follies, 2006, 149

Fun to arrange them in cross-temporal couples, using Auster’s characteristics. I’ve matched ‘sexual proclivities’ so that each couple has at least one thing in common, sort of.

Christopher Marlowe and Somerset Maugham

Marcel Proust and Bruce Chatwin

Jean Genet and Henry James

Stendhal and Emily Dickinson

Byron and Beatrix Potter

George Eliot and the Marquis de Sade

D.H. Lawrence and Jane Austen

Rainer Maria Rilke and Germaine Greer

Arnold Bennett and Emily Bronte

Well, you get the idea. No lawyer, though.

 

I had read some pieces by DFW – for one, his piece on John Ziegler in The Atlantic – but not Infinite Jest (1079 pp of which 196 pp of notes) and it was clear from the Ziegler piece alone that here was a seriously interesting and famously depressive writer, and since I take a close and personal interest in how writers deal with their depressions, when he went and resolved his with his pyjama cord on September 12 it felt like the only thing to do was to read the big one. Survivor guilt, guilt-about-not-keeping-up, morbid curiosity about proleptic passages, healthy desire to try to comprehend the brute, mute facticity of the pyjama cord, lastly actual hope that such a huge reputation would prove to be more than the usual puff-bubble.

It is, it is. (Oh thanks say the Wallacians out there, but cut me some aging slack here).

I am trying hard to resist just adding a few paltry adjectives to the cairn on the web. But Infinite Jest is one of those books that make you want while reading it to button-hole people and quote at them, quote something from practically every page, quote whole pages, a pre-critical gushing love affair.

As at 22nd October in the O.N.AN.-ite Year of the Dependable Adult Undergarment, the first appearance of Madame Psychosis with her midnight radio show, which tonight features reading from the come-all-ye brochure of the Union of the Hideously and Improbably Deformed (“Bell-shaped steatopygiacs, in your special slacks”) as at, therefore, a mere p 190 I have become addicted.

Amongst the many obits online (Google and take your pick) the one that made me desperately want to read Wallace was by Scott McLemee, especially this bit:

In one of his last published writings (how terrible it feels to put it that way) David Foster Wallace referred to ‘the sound of our U.S. culture right now’ as Total Noise: ‘a culture and volume of info and spin and rhetoric and context that I know I’m not alone in finding too much to even absorb, much less to try to make sense of or organize into any kind of triage of saliency or value. Such basic absorption, organization, and triage used to be what was required of an educated adult, a.k.a. an informed citizen – at least that’s what I got taught. Suffice it here to say that the requirements now seem different…. In sum, to really try to be informed and literate today is to feel stupid nearly all the time, and to need help. That?s about as clearly as I can put it.?

He went on to mention, all too briefly, his hope that there might be ‘a model for what free, informed adulthood might look like in the context of Total Noise: not just the intelligence to discern one’s own error or stupidity, but the humility to address it, absorb it, and move on and out therefrom, bravely, toward the next revealed error.’

I have been thinking off and on for a long time, not all that productively, about Matthew Arnold’s account of Zerstreutheit (‘being-scattered-ness’ maybe) and how much worse things have become since he wrote and how in particular, to adopt Wallace’s term, the Noise menaces the manic and introverted. Against this background I found what Wallace had to say compellingly accurate and brave. Reading even 190 pages of Infinite Jest shows how deliberately exposed he was to the Noise. I don’t know enough about Wallace and I am old-fashioned about these matters, so I’m not going to connect the dots here but it looks to me as if Wallace’s creative work was, like Samuel Beckett’s, heroic. He resembles Beckett as well in the love and admiration he inspired in those who knew him.

 

American poet, August Kleinzahler, writes:

? I, for one, have never in my lifetime seen the situation of poetry in this country more dire or desperate. Nor is the future promising. Cultural and economic forces only suggest further devastation of any sort of vital literary culture, along with the prospects of the very, very few?it is always only a very few?poets who will matter down the road. What little of real originality is out there is drowning in the waste products spewing from graduate writing programs like the hog farm waste that recently overflowed its holding tanks in the wake of Hurricane Isabel, fouling the Carolina countryside and poisoning everything in its path.

Let me put it starkly: the better animals in the jungle aren?t drawn to poetry anymore ? Just as the new genre of the novel drew off most of the brilliant young writers of the nineteenth century, movies, television, MTV, advertising, rock ?n? roll, and the internet have taken the best among the recent crop of young talent. Do you suppose for a moment that a spirited youngster with a brilliant, original mind and gifted up the yin-yang is going to sit still for two years of creative writing poetry workshops presided over by a dispirited, compromised mediocrity, all the while critiquing and being critiqued by younger versions of the same?

Theme Tweaker by Unreal