While looking about for a couple of useful Burney links, I came across this perturbing story. The scholar Ellen Moody some years ago started a number of online discussions of Burney’s novels. She is obviously a woman of fortitude; most of us would have given up, faced with the resulting torrent of flames, trivia and vicious pranks . But she and her colleagues hung in there long enough to get results. Sample threads are on her site.

Dr Moody concludes her page:

Since the existence of large fan communities generates money and favorable partisan coterie publicity, it is in the interest of anyone who works or becomes involved with any projects involving Austen and (lately increasingly) Burney to begin with an exaggerated respect; any sharp criticism must be presented in somewhat disguised forms.The phenomenon of the cult figure or group of texts is an important one in our era, and we need frank discussion of how different cults arise, what imagined characteristics cult figures are typically endowed with by their fans, what kinds of people become fervent fans of literary writers and their characters, and what is the effect of such cults on serious study of works of the imagination.

We could do all that. Or we could just tip-toe away. They’re making too much noise to notice.

 

burney-smaller

Norbury Park, Wednesday, November 3rd 1784

Nothing can be more truly pleasant than our present lives. I bury all disquietudes in immediate enjoyment; an enjoyment more fitted to my secret mind than any I had ever hoped to attain. We are so perfectly tranquil that not a particle of our whole frames seems ruffled or discomposed. Mr Locke is gayer and more sportive than I have ever seen him; his Fredy seems made up of happiness; and the two dear little girls are in spirits almost ecstatic; and all from that internal contentment which Norbury Park seems to have gathered from all corners of the world into its own sphere.

Our mornings, if fine, are to ourselves, as Mr Locke rides out; if bad, we assemble in the picture room. We have two books in public reading, Madame de Sevign?’s Letters and Cook’s last voyage. Mrs Locke reads the French, myself the English.

Our conversations, too, are such that I could almost wish to last for ever. Mr Locke has been all himself – all instruction, information and intelligence, – since we have been left alone; and the invariable sweetness, as well as judgment, of all he says, leaves, indeed, nothing to wish.

They will not let me go while I can stay, and I am now most willing to stay till I must go. The serenity of a life like this smooths the whole internal surface of the mind. My own, I assure you, begins to feel quite glossy ?

_The Famous Miss Burney: the Diaries and Letters of Fanny Burney, eds Barbara G. Schrank and David J. Supino, 1976.

1. Estimate the number of household servants required to support this idle lifestyle and the quantity of agony endured by them.

2. Comment on the phrase gathered from all corners of the world with particular attention to the plantation slaves of the West Indies.

3. Specify the ideological function of (a) Madame de Sevign? (b) Cook’s Voyages.

4. Which form of address is the more sexist, Fanny Burney or Miss Burney?

4. Stop sighing with helpless, hopeless longing.

 

Date the following passage.

In the past, a rising class was aware of something valuable enjoyed by others which it wished to share; but this is not so today. The leaders of the rising class are consumed with a contempt for everything which does not spring from their own desires, they are convinced in advance that they have nothing to learn and everything to teach, and consequently their aim is loot?to appropriate to themselves the organization, the shell of the institution, and convert it to their own purposes. The problem of the universities today is how to avoid destruction at the hands of men who have no use for their characteristic virtues, men who are convinced only that ‘knowledge is power.’

If you said 1969 you have everything on your side except the facts. These are: that the author is Michael Oakeshott, writing in The Cambridge Magazine and that he wrote this passage in 1949.

 

Glum news in The Australian this morning. Some Scottish constables want ‘a return to plain English’. They say people make fun of them when they talk. The Plain English Campaign is also calling on police to use simpler language.
And just when I’d learnt the right name for copspeak (see also here).

Interesting that it’s people at constable rank who want the reform. It is further confirmation of Wordability’s Law of Plain Speaking in Organisations (LOPSO) which states that only people at the top or at the bottom of an organisation are permitted to speak plainly. If you want to know what’s going on, ask the CEO or the bloke in the mail-room.

 

Unbelievable news via Reeling and Writhing. It’s one of my frequent small laments that Waugh wrote a finite number of novels. Now there’s to be another.

?This is vintage Waugh,? said an insider, ?from the same period as Vile Bodies and Scoop, and every bit as sharp and laugh-out-loud funny as those books.?

Those looking for a reason for living need look no more.

 

On September 1st, 1773, Boswell, Johnson and their servants set out on horseback for the crossing to the island of Skye.

johnson-by-opieIt grew dusky; and we had a very tedious ride for what was called five miles; but I am sure would measure ten. We had no conversation. I was riding forward to the inn at Glenelg on the shore opposite to Sky, that I might take proper measures, before Dr Johnson, who was now advancing in dreary silence, Hay leading his horse, should arrive. Vass also walked by the side of his horse, and Joseph followed behind: as therefore he was thus attended, and seemed to be in deep meditation, I thought there could be no harm in leaving him for a little while. He called me back with a tremendous shout, and was really in a passion with me for leaving him. I told him my intentions, but he was not satisfied, and said, ‘Do you know, I should as soon have thought of picking a pocket, as doing so.’

BOSWELL. ‘I am diverted with you, sir.’

JOHNSON. ‘Sir, I could never be diverted with incivility. Doing such a thing, makes one lose confidence in him who has done it, as one cannot tell what he may do next.’

His extraordinary warmth confounded me so much, that I justified myself but lamely to him; yet my intentions were not improper. I wished to get on, to see how we were to be lodged, and how we were to get a boat; all which I thought I could best settle myself ? I however continued to ride by him, finding he wished I should do so.

Next morning, the quarrel is made up. Johnson owns that he spoke in passion, Boswell that he took it too hard, and they set out in a boat for Skye. Continue reading »

Theme Tweaker by Unreal