There’s a review of this movie at the Noel Coward Society Website which does the basics nicely.

Amongst the felicities, the casting of Jessica Biel as the Woman with a Past. It’s difficult to adapt a ‘stagy’ stage play, one that exploits the big entrance, the expressive group, the d?nouement with the hero centre stage. Keep too much of that stuff, and the film goes dead; do too much, in an effort to avoid stasis, and you’re out on your own with an unrelated mise-en-sc?ne. (Opera films offer hideous examples of both kinds of failure.)

Coward’s play is full of big scenes and strong confrontations, often with Biel’s character front and centre. Biel holds it together with the complete self-possession of a former model and the presence of a first-rate romantic actress. Continue reading »

 

Turns out Dr Garry Gillard, friend to this blog, has a chapter about art film in his Ten Types of Australian Film, available online.

Virtually every Australian film-maker chases a government subsidy, and to that end they write elaborate submissions. It would be interesting to compare how they describe their projects with the genres into which Garry places them. I have a hunch that many of the submissions would get the word ‘art’ in there somewhere, trading on the received view that art is good for you, like milk, and should be subsidised, like dairy farms. Then there’d be the ones that claim to be forging Australian Identity, which is something you get from watching movies.

 

People talk of ‘monetising’ (or if American, of ‘monetizing’); their blogs or websites. Why this verb? Let’s consider the options. ‘Making money out of’ hints at exploitation, ‘making money from’ suggests that money will actually be made (with blogs, about a 1/1,000,000 chance) To ‘monetise’ cleans up the process; it’s technical and neutral; neither ethics nor the possibility of success need enter into it.

Nothing wrong with making money. I just wish people would be more straightforward about it.

Consider the case of Nathan Rice, a prominent WordPress guru and theme designer. Continue reading »

 

A younger generation – there, I’ve said it – is suspicious of the ‘art film’. The category itself is an odd one, implying as it does that other kinds of movies can’t be ‘art’. It was the collapse of the ‘high-low’ distinction that made the problem. What used to be arranged in a hierarchy had to be redistributed into genres, and those declared equal. Over here, Truffaut and Pasolini and that lot; over there, slasher movies. Trouble is, there is a lingering aura around ‘art’ which can’t quite be dispelled by reading Walter Benjamin. So the young are quick to pounce on any movie with arty pretensions. And so they should be.

Is a movie like Stephen Daldry’s The Hours an art film? Looks that way – literary subject, for example. But here’s Hermione Lee, biographer of Virginia Woolf, on the scene in which Woolf drowns herself.

Lee ? flinched at the portrayal of Woolf in Stephen Daldry’s film of The Hours. Woolf wrote Mrs Dalloway in her early 40s and committed suicide at age 59, but Lee argues the film makes it seem she killed herself immediately after completing the novel. Lee was also troubled by Daldry’s romantic recreation of Woolf’s suicide, in which she “drifts into this beautiful green leaf-shaded river with birds singing and wonderful throbbing music and sun playing on the dappled water”.

Lee explains, “Woolf killed herself in great agony of mind, on a bleak day in March, in a river where the water runs so fast that nothing grows on the banks.” When Lee confronted Daldry about his travesty of Woolf’s death, he retorted that Nicole Kidman could only film in July.

 

There is a link now available to download the 125-page transcript (in the form of a .pdf document) of the original 1978 story conference between Steven Spielberg, George Lucas, and Lawrence Kasdan for a little film called Raiders of the Lost Ark.

Mystery Man in Film provides a ten point summary of what screen writers can learn from the great men. Here’s my three point summary:

  • have a bunch of lurid ideas straight out of cheap fiction
  • take them seriously
  • add magic so that anyone of any age can enjoy the movie

Simple, huh? Now go make your fortune, little pig.

 

I’m reading through the suitcase of memories – well, not ‘through’, I stop and stare into space and rootle around for more of something. There are some letters from a girl with whom I had a brief encounter. My whole pre-suitcase memory of that was: I Did her Wrong, she wrote angrily to me, I didn’t reply, I was a Rat with Women.

The reality conveyed by the letters is completely different. Seems I did write, and here’s part of the response:

Believe me, I’ve no regrets, only a great deal of happiness to look back on.

There are more letters. Seems also that I was exploring the possibility of leaving for her city – permanently? – and although she was now involved with someone else, she was busy organising a job and somewhere to stay. Kindness and care, when all I had remembered was rage and betrayal. Continue reading »

Theme Tweaker by Unreal